2011/11/21 Daniel Krügler <daniel.krueg...@googlemail.com>: > 2011/11/21 Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>: >> On 11/20/2011 08:02 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: >>> >>> .. also, I was under the impression that c++/48322 was the only reason >>> we couldn't write something very simple, thus no __all_convertible, ie, >>> something using directly: >>> >>> enable_if<__and_<is_convertible<_UElements, _Elements>...>::value>::type >> >> Yep, you can do that now. > > Yes, __all_convertible is a relict that made sense, before __and_ > was introduced.
To be more precise here: The direct expansion did raise compiler errors at that time, which seem to be fixed now. - Daniel
