On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 01:32:11PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > >> +hppa*-*-netbsd*) > >> + target_cpu_default="MASK_PA_11|MASK_NO_SPACE_REGS" > > Any reason to not use the PA 2.0 ISA? I'm virtually certain we > > supported the 32bit ABI running on PA 2.0 hardware in hpbsd (which is > > where the netbsd PA code is ultimately derived from). I'd be really > > surprised if there's any PA1.1 hardware running anywhere, though there's > > certainly some PA2.0 hardware out in the wild. > You might also consider adding MASK_CALLER_COPIES as libgomp is broken for > callee > copies. This is an ABI choice so ideally you should do it now or not at all.
Hi Jeff, Dave, I've spoken to the authority of NetBSD/hppa (that's Nick Hudson), and he said he'd rather keep the ABI as it is for the purpose of upstreaming. He might switch ABIs eventually, but would rather do it with the local copy of GCC first. (And he has several PA1.1 machines :)) Thanks.
