On 10/06/19 18:46 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland via libstdc++ wrote:
On 6/10/19 2:43 AM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 02:53, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
Darn it, I had those constexpr lib patches in tree.
Attached are what I just committed to gcc-9 and passes there. Those
std::copy didn't really add anything anyway.
They added a test that *i++ = *j++ works, and that i != j works.
Ok,
Here is a version that adds back a hand written copy thing to test
Ville's observation.
This is tested on a clean branch.
I would also like to add the same copy lines to the gcc-9 branch.
OK?
Ok for trunk and gcc-9-branch, thanks.
