Committed as obvious in revision 272084. The problem was that the lhs symbol itself was not being checked as a proc_pointer - just the expression component.
I will get on with backporting tomorrow. Cheers Paul 2019-06-08 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/90786 * trans-expr.c (pointer_assignment_is_proc_pointer) Remove as it is very simple and only called from one place. (gfc_trans_pointer_assignment): Rename non_proc_pointer_assign as non_proc_ptr_assign. Assign to it directly, rather than call to above, deleted function and use gfc_expr_attr instead of only checking the reference chain. 2019-06-08 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/90786 * gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_51.f90 : New test.
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c =================================================================== *** gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c (revision 272076) --- gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c (working copy) *************** class_array_fcn: *** 4881,4887 **** parmse->expr = gfc_build_addr_expr (NULL_TREE, parmse->expr); /* Basically make this into ! if (present) { if (contiguous) --- 4881,4887 ---- parmse->expr = gfc_build_addr_expr (NULL_TREE, parmse->expr); /* Basically make this into ! if (present) { if (contiguous) *************** trans_caf_token_assign (gfc_se *lse, gfc *** 8979,9001 **** } } - /* Indentify class valued proc_pointer assignments. */ - - static bool - pointer_assignment_is_proc_pointer (gfc_expr * expr1, gfc_expr * expr2) - { - gfc_ref * ref; - - ref = expr1->ref; - while (ref && ref->next) - ref = ref->next; - - return ref && ref->type == REF_COMPONENT - && ref->u.c.component->attr.proc_pointer - && expr2->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE - && expr2->symtree->n.sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE; - } - /* Do everything that is needed for a CLASS function expr2. */ --- 8979,8984 ---- *************** gfc_trans_pointer_assignment (gfc_expr * *** 9048,9054 **** tree desc; tree tmp; tree expr1_vptr = NULL_TREE; ! bool scalar, non_proc_pointer_assign; gfc_ss *ss; gfc_start_block (&block); --- 9031,9037 ---- tree desc; tree tmp; tree expr1_vptr = NULL_TREE; ! bool scalar, non_proc_ptr_assign; gfc_ss *ss; gfc_start_block (&block); *************** gfc_trans_pointer_assignment (gfc_expr * *** 9056,9062 **** gfc_init_se (&lse, NULL); /* Usually testing whether this is not a proc pointer assignment. */ ! non_proc_pointer_assign = !pointer_assignment_is_proc_pointer (expr1, expr2); /* Check whether the expression is a scalar or not; we cannot use expr1->rank as it can be nonzero for proc pointers. */ --- 9039,9047 ---- gfc_init_se (&lse, NULL); /* Usually testing whether this is not a proc pointer assignment. */ ! non_proc_ptr_assign = !(gfc_expr_attr (expr1).proc_pointer ! && expr2->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE ! && expr2->symtree->n.sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE); /* Check whether the expression is a scalar or not; we cannot use expr1->rank as it can be nonzero for proc pointers. */ *************** gfc_trans_pointer_assignment (gfc_expr * *** 9066,9072 **** gfc_free_ss_chain (ss); if (expr1->ts.type == BT_DERIVED && expr2->ts.type == BT_CLASS ! && expr2->expr_type != EXPR_FUNCTION && non_proc_pointer_assign) { gfc_add_data_component (expr2); /* The following is required as gfc_add_data_component doesn't --- 9051,9057 ---- gfc_free_ss_chain (ss); if (expr1->ts.type == BT_DERIVED && expr2->ts.type == BT_CLASS ! && expr2->expr_type != EXPR_FUNCTION && non_proc_ptr_assign) { gfc_add_data_component (expr2); /* The following is required as gfc_add_data_component doesn't *************** gfc_trans_pointer_assignment (gfc_expr * *** 9086,9092 **** else gfc_conv_expr (&rse, expr2); ! if (non_proc_pointer_assign && expr1->ts.type == BT_CLASS) { trans_class_vptr_len_assignment (&block, expr1, expr2, &rse, NULL, NULL); --- 9071,9077 ---- else gfc_conv_expr (&rse, expr2); ! if (non_proc_ptr_assign && expr1->ts.type == BT_CLASS) { trans_class_vptr_len_assignment (&block, expr1, expr2, &rse, NULL, NULL); Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_51.f90 =================================================================== *** gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_51.f90 (nonexistent) --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_51.f90 (working copy) *************** *** 0 **** --- 1,38 ---- + ! { dg-do run } + ! + ! Test the fix for PR90786. + ! + ! Contributed by Andrew benson <abenso...@gmail.com> + ! + module f + procedure(c), pointer :: c_ + + type :: s + integer :: i = 42 + end type s + class(s), pointer :: res, tgt + + contains + + function c() + implicit none + class(s), pointer :: c + c => tgt + return + end function c + + subroutine fs() + implicit none + c_ => c ! This used to ICE + return + end subroutine fs + + end module f + + use f + allocate (tgt, source = s(99)) + call fs() + res => c_() + if (res%i .ne. 99) stop 1 + deallocate (tgt) + end