On 6/6/19 1:32 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > It looks like the updated comment for get_range_strlen didn't make > it into the strlen fixup commits last December and the function > still has the old description. (Not surprising given there are > at least two overloads of the same function and things moving > between them.) I'm going to check in the comment from the patch > here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg02050.html > with an additional sentence describing ELTSIZE. > > Let me know if you'd like me to tweak it or if spot something > else. > > Thanks > Martin > > gcc-gimple-fold-get_range_strlen-comment.diff > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * gimple-fold.c (get_range_strlen): Update comment that didn't > make it into r267503 or related commits. OK. Sorry about that. Not sure how I missed it. It's all a bit of a blur at this point.
jeff
