On 29/05/19 15:32 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
* include/pstl/algorithm_fwd.h: Synchronize with
upstream PSTL project.
* include/pstl/algorithm_impl.h: Likewise.
* include/pstl/execution_defs.h: Likewise.
* include/pstl/execution_impl.h: Likewise.
* include/pstl/glue_algorithm_impl.h: Likewise.
* include/pstl/glue_execution_defs.h: Likewise.
* include/pstl/numeric_fwd.h: Likewise.
* include/pstl/numeric_impl.h: Likewise.
* include/pstl/parallel_backend.h: Likewise.
* include/pstl/pstl_config.h: Likewise.
* include/pstl/unseq_backend_simd.h: Likewise.
* include/pstl/parallel_backend_serial.h: New file.
* include/Makefile.am (pstl_headers): Add
parallel_backend_serial.h.
* include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
A couple of non-uglified names crept in, "f" and "n":
template <class _ExecutionPolicy, class _ForwardIterator1, class _Size, class
_ForwardIterator2, class _Function,
class _IsVector>
_ForwardIterator2
-__pattern_walk2_n(_ExecutionPolicy&&, _ForwardIterator1 __first1, _Size __n,
_ForwardIterator2 __first2, _Function __f,
+__pattern_walk2_n(_ExecutionPolicy&&, _ForwardIterator1 __first1, _Size n,
_ForwardIterator2 __first2, _Function f,
_IsVector is_vector, /*parallel=*/std::false_type) noexcept
{
- return __internal::__brick_walk2_n(__first1, __n, __first2, __f,
is_vector);
+ return __internal::__brick_walk2_n(__first1, n, __first2, f, is_vector);
}
template <class _ExecutionPolicy, class _RandomAccessIterator1, class _Size,
class _RandomAccessIterator2,
class _Function, class _IsVector>
_RandomAccessIterator2
-__pattern_walk2_n(_ExecutionPolicy&& __exec, _RandomAccessIterator1 __first1,
_Size __n, _RandomAccessIterator2 __first2,
- _Function __f, _IsVector __is_vector,
/*parallel=*/std::true_type)
+__pattern_walk2_n(_ExecutionPolicy&& __exec, _RandomAccessIterator1 __first1,
_Size n, _RandomAccessIterator2 __first2,
+ _Function f, _IsVector is_vector,
/*parallel=*/std::true_type)
{
"n" is actually a reserved name (it's a member function of the
chi_squared_distribution and the fisher_f_distribution) but for
consistency we should uglify it here. And "f" isn't a reserve name at
all.
Also as mentioned on IRC< there are pre-existing uses of _T which
should be _Tp (because _T is a macro in some BSD system ehaders IIRC)
and there are also local variables called copy_range1 and copy_range2
which should be uglified.
