On 2019-05-26 12:13 p.m., Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Mai 26 2019, John David Anglin <dave.ang...@bell.net> wrote: > >> Index: config/pa/linux-unwind.h >> =================================================================== >> --- config/pa/linux-unwind.h (revision 271614) >> +++ config/pa/linux-unwind.h (working copy) >> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ >> return _URC_END_OF_STACK; >> >> frame = (struct rt_sigframe *)(sp + off); >> - sc = &frame->uc.uc_mcontext; >> + sc = (struct sigcontext *)&frame->uc.uc_mcontext; > Why is it not better to use the correct type? I can't remember the full details why "struct sigcontext *" was used for the type of sc but I think it was done to avoid the renaming of the fields in the mcontext_t type.
Dave -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
