On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 19:21, Steve Kargl <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:26:53PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 15:54, Mark Eggleston > > <mark.eggles...@codethink.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > > The logs contain: > > > > /gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_f_default_field_width_1.f90:15:11: > > > > Error: Kind 16 not supported for type REAL at (1) > > > > > > > > Christophe > > > > > > Apologies, I'd forgotten that kind=16 is not always defined. The > > > attached patch modifies the test cases to take this into account. I > > > currently have no means of verifying this. > > > > > > Please confirm that this patch solves the problem. > > > > > > > I confirm this patch does fix the problem, thanks > > > > Patch committed as r271573. >
Hi, Sorry, I didn't check all the testcases you changed, and this commit introduces a new failure on arm: /gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_f_default_field_width_3.f90:23:23: Error: Nonnegative width required in format string at (1) /gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_f_default_field_width_3.f90:26:23: Error: Nonnegative width required in format string at (1) /gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_f_default_field_width_3.f90:29:23: Error: Nonnegative width required in format string at (1) compiler exited with status 1 PASS: gfortran.dg/fmt_f_default_field_width_3.f90 -O (test for errors, line 23) PASS: gfortran.dg/fmt_f_default_field_width_3.f90 -O (test for errors, line 26) PASS: gfortran.dg/fmt_f_default_field_width_3.f90 -O (test for errors, line 29) FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_f_default_field_width_3.f90 -O (test for errors, line 33) PASS: gfortran.dg/fmt_f_default_field_width_3.f90 -O (test for excess errors) that is, it seems there's no error message generated for line 33. Christophe > -- > Steve
