On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:11:30PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 23/05/2019 17:01, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > On 23/05/2019 15:11, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > >> On 23/05/2019 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > >>> On 20/05/2019 20:24, Jeff Law wrote: > >>>> On 4/9/19 10:36 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > >>>>> On 09/04/2019 16:04, Jeff Law wrote: > >>>>>> On 4/8/19 9:17 AM, co...@sdf.org wrote: > >>>>>>> Pinging again in the hope of getting the patch in, I'd like to have > >>>>>>> less outstanding patches :) (I have quite a few and new releases > >>>>>>> can become painful!) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> gcc/ChangeLog > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> config.gcc (arm*-*-netbsdelf*) Add support for EABI configuration > >>>>>>> config.host (arm*-*-netbsd*): Build driver-arm.o > >>>>>>> config/arm/netbsd-eabi.h: New file. > >>>>>>> config/arm/netbsd-elf.h > >>>>>>> config/netbsd-elf.h: Define SUBTARGET_EXTRA_SPECS. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> libgcc/ChangeLog > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> config.host (arm*-*-netbsdelf*): Add support for EABI configuration > >>>>>>> config/arm/t-netbsd: LIB1ASMFUNCS: Append to existing set. > >>>>>>> HOST_LIBGCC2_CFLAGS: workaround possible bug > >>>>>>> config/arm/t-netbsd-eabi: New file. > >>>>>> So we're well into stage4 which means technically it's too late for > >>>>>> something like this. However, given it's limited scope I won't object > >>>>>> if the ARM port maintainers want to go forward. Otherwise I'll queue > >>>>>> it > >>>>>> for gcc-10. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> jeff > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I was about to approve this (modulo removing the now obsolete > >>>>> FPU_DEFAULT macro), until I noticed that it also modifies the generic > >>>>> NetBSD code as well. I'm certainly not willing to approve that myself > >>>>> at this late stage, but if one of the NetBSD OS maintainers wants to > >>>>> step up and do so, I'll happily take the Arm back-end code as that's not > >>>>> a primary or secondary target. > >>>> So is removal of the FPUTYPE_DEFAULT stuff all that's needed for this to > >>>> go forward now that Jason T has chimed in? > >>>> > >>>> jeff > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> Very close. I was just doing a last pass through the patch to make that > >>> small edit when I noticed this in config/arm/netbsd-eabi.h: > >>> > >>> > >>> #define SUBTARGET_EXTRA_ASM_SPEC \ > >>> "-matpcs ..." > >>> > >>> Why is the assembler unconditionally passed -matpcs for an eabi > >>> configuration? That sounds broken. > >>> > >>> R. > >>> > >> > >> > >> Looking at what GAS does with this flag, it simply causes the assembler > >> to create an empty .arm.atpcs debug section. On that basis, I would > >> expect that it's then safe (and correct) to remove this: the EABI is not > >> the ATPCS. > >> > >> R. > >> > > > > > > Finally, I need the names of the authors and their email addresses in a > > format suitable for the ChangeLog file. As far as I can tell, that means: > > > > Yourself > > Matt Thomas > > Matthew Green > > Nick Hudson > > > > R. > > > > Argh, there's a final issue. We can't find a copyright assignment > against your email address. Do you have one? > > R.
Unfortunately no :-( How do I do it?
