On 5/22/19 9:50 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 09:39:52AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: >> The patch is about using of uintptr_t instead unsigned long that's >> being used for printing value of a pointer. >> >> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests. >> >> Ready to be installed? > > No. You haven't adjusted the fprintf format strings for this change, > so it will break build on any target where uintptr_t is not unsigned long. > > I don't see any gcc/ code using the PRIxPTR and similar macros, so no idea > about the portability of that, but I'd think we just should keep that as is.
Ok. Martin > > Jakub >
