On 5/14/19 8:14 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Several SVE patterns need define_insn_and_splits that generate the > same insn_code, but with different operands. That's probably a > niche requirement, but it's cropping up often enough on the ACLE > branch that I think it would be good to have a syntactic sugar for it. > > This patch therefore adds a new construct called define_insn_and_rewrite. > It's basically a define_insn_and_split with an implicit split pattern, > obtained by copying the insn pattern and replacing match_operands with > match_dups and match_operators with match_op_dups. > > Any comments? Suggestions for better names? No strong opinions here other than to mention that I think there's other places we could use this.
Jeff
