On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 03:24:52PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Hi, > > On 15/05/19 14:29, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > On 5/14/19 5:20 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > > > Hi again, > > > > > > ... so the below passes testing on x86_64-linux. In fact, I think we > > > are on a pretty safe ground, now at the beginning of Stage 1: if, > > > over the next months we get a testcase which causes one of the 4 > > > tightened gcc_assert to trip we'll comfortably deal with it. > > > > great, thanks for trying that. Marek found the nits. > > Thus, I'm going ahead with those obvious formatting changes, agreed?
Go ahead. Marek
