On 13/05/19 14:02 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 23:41, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
More Doxygenation.
Tested powerpc64le-linux. Committed to trunk.
You've probably noticed by now, but this introduced a regression (!):
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/Wattributes1.C -std=c++14 (test for warnings, line 125)
Erm, yes, let's pretend I'd run the compiler testsuite and noticed by
now, shall we? :-)
This is because you added a line to libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/new and the
warning now appears at line 126....
I can certainly patch the test and replace 125 with 126 in it, I'm
just not sure want to keep this fragile dependency?
Yeah, I hate dg-error line numbers that refer into some arbitrary line
of a header. I'll take care of it, thanks for pointing it out.