On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 01:09:00PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: > > cp/ > > * call.c (null_ptr_cst_p): Order checks according to expensiveness. > > (conversion_null_warnings): Likewise. > > * typeck.c (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p): Return > > early if type1 == type2. > > this patch caused > > +XPASS: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-35.C -std=gnu++98 bug (test for warnings, > line 14) > > First seen on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and sparc-sun-solaris2.11, according > to gcc-testresults everywhere. Confirmed by reverting the patch locally > and re-testing the affected testcase.
I can reproduce that too, seems to be the @@ -6896,8 +6897,8 @@ } /* Handle zero as null pointer warnings for cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR */ - else if (null_ptr_cst_p (expr) && - (TYPE_PTR_OR_PTRMEM_P (totype) || NULLPTR_TYPE_P (totype))) + else if ((TYPE_PTR_OR_PTRMEM_P (totype) || NULLPTR_TYPE_P (totype)) + && null_ptr_cst_p (expr)) { location_t loc = get_location_for_expr_unwinding_for_system_header (expr); maybe_warn_zero_as_null_pointer_constant (expr, loc); hunk. The Wunused-var-35.C patch hasn't been posted to gcc-patches, but judging from the corresponding PR, I'd say the right thing is below. Regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2019-04-25 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR c++/44648 * g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-35.C: Remove xfail. --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-35.C.jj 2019-02-04 09:44:31.365413407 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-35.C 2019-04-25 13:24:49.717065815 +0200 @@ -11,9 +11,8 @@ int main() else return 1; - if (const bool b2 = 1) // { dg-warning "\\\[-Wunused-variable\\\]" "bug" { xfail c++98_only } } + if (const bool b2 = 1) // { dg-warning "\\\[-Wunused-variable\\\]" } return 0; else return 1; } - Jakub