Joern Rennecke <joern.renne...@embecosm.com> writes: > On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 11:07, Richard Sandiford > <richard.sandif...@arm.com> wrote: > > >> > 2019-04-04 Joern Rennecke <joern.renne...@embecosm.com> >> > >> > * sched-deps.c (sched_macro_fuse_insns): Check return value of >> > targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs. >> >> OK, thanks. > > Thanks for the review. > > Is that OK restricted to delayed applying once the gcc 9 branch has > been cut and gcc 10 stage 1 opened (because the bug is not a > regression unless going back to 2013) > or also OK to apply to the current 9.0.0 trunk (since this should be a > safe patch and leaving the bug in might hinder debugging to find > actual regressions) ?
OK now IMO. A regression from 2013 is still a regression, and like you say, it should be very safe. I think arm is the only affected in-tree port, and it's only going to help there. Thanks, Richard
