On Nov 11, 2011, at 12:25 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote: > FWIW your example doesn't reproduce the problem because it contains no > objective c exceptions code.
Ah, but it can be seen to contradict what you said. It also found a bug. > However, OK - I see your point (I also see where the problem came from). :-) Which is why it is occasionally important to restate the obvious, to ensure we're all on the same page. > Patch under test to fix this (will post later). Thanks.
