On 3/20/19 4:50 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi Jason ---
On 17/03/19 21:06, Jason Merrill wrote:
Earlier changes to defer instantiating a defaulted noexcept-specifier
that
depends on yet-unparsed default member initializers broke this testcase,
where instantiation fails for another reason. In this case there's no
reason to defer and try again later, so let's not.
[snip]
Thanks.
Volker added to the audit trail the below, vaguely related, testcase,
also a recent error recovery regression. Shall we just avoid passing
error_mark_node to comp_except_specs and continue? Tested x86_64-linux.
OK.
Jason
