Hi,
Thanks Christophe! I have committed a backport of r269499 including the
testism fix r269596 to gcc-8 branch in r269613.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-03-12 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>
Backport from mainline
2019-03-08 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>
* config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_FP16_TO_DOUBLE): Add TARGET_VFP_DOUBLE
requirement.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-03-12 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>
Backport from mainline
2019-03-08 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>
* gcc.target/arm/f16_f64_conv_no_dp.c: New test.
Backport from mainline
2019-03-11 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org>
* gcc.target/arm/f16_f64_conv_no_dp.c: Add arm_fp16_ok effective
target.
On 11/03/2019 20:50, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
Nope, just do it after testing it and adjust with Christophes follow up
R
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, 10:36 Andre Vieira (lists),
<andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com <mailto:andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>>
wrote:
Hi,
Any objections to me backporting this to GCC 8 and 7?
Cheers,
Andre
On 08/03/2019 17:30, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> vcvtb.f16.f64 and vcvtb.f64.f16 were being made available even
for FPUs
> that do not support double precision. This patch fixes that.
>
> Regression tested for arm-none-eabi.
>
> Committed in r269499.
>
> Cheers,
> Andre
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 2019-03-08 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com
<mailto:andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>>
>
> * config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_FP16_TO_DOUBLE): Add
TARGET_VFP_DOUBLE
> requirement.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2019-03-08 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com
<mailto:andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>>
>
> * gcc.target/arm/f16_f64_conv_no_dp.c: New test.
