On 2/8/19 4:07 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Feb 7, 2019, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
In protected_accessible_p and shared_member_p, if we're left with a
USING_DECL after strip_using_decl, we can't give a meaningful answer,
and should probably abort; we shouldn't get here with a dependent
expression.
In g++.dg/lookup/using39.C, shared_member_p is called by
cp_parser_primary_expression -> finish_id_expression ->
finish_id_expression_1 -> finish_qualified_id_expr when parsing 'using
A<T>::f' in B<T>.
Then I think finish_qualified_id_expr should check
type_dependent_expression_p first.
Jason
