> On 4 Feb 2019, at 08:55, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 at 00:13, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> On Jan 23, 2019, at 5:16 AM, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> >> wrote: >>> What do people think about this? >> >> Seems reasonable. > > Thanks, committed as r268511.
There are a few improvements we might want to look at; 1) application to the libraries (other than libstdc++) 2) things are inconsistent between -j1 and -jN check runs because the dg-extract doesn’t seem to be run for j1. - this means that the timeout warnings are not changed - but it also seems to remove the sorting (for some reason I thought that was part of test_summary), which means that one can’t compare a -j1 run with a -jN run easily (or so it seems from some quick tests). .. won’t have any cycles for looking at this in the next few weeks - but a “heads up” anyway. Iain
