Hi! As mentioned in the PR, the following testcases FAIL, because a VAR_DECL for a PARAMETER inside of a BLOCK is not added to the BIND_EXPR vars and thus the middle-end doesn't consider it defined.
The problem is in the following test, which passes for all the PR67885 tests, but doesn't really test whether this is a parameter in a BLOCK namespace. It actually tests whether the parent namespace (usually function/subroutine body, but could be another BLOCK) has EXEC_BLOCK as the first executable statement in it. As I said in the PR, we could walk the linked list from sym->ns->parent->code through ->next pointers and look for EXEC_BLOCK which has sym->ns as the attached namespace, but that could be compile time expensive (consider a function with a million of blocks in it and in each of them one or more referenced parameters - that would be O(n^2) compile time). The following patch instead checks the bit flag set only in EXEC_BLOCK namespaces. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2019-02-01 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR fortran/83246 PR fortran/89084 * trans-decl.c (generate_local_decl): Add referenced FL_PARAMETERs if sym->ns->construct_entities rather than if sym->ns->parent->code->op == EXEC_BLOCK. * gfortran.dg/pr89084.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/lto/pr89084_0.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/pr83246.f90: New test. --- gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c.jj 2019-01-19 09:41:46.465393897 +0100 +++ gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c 2019-02-01 18:28:35.376176176 +0100 @@ -5735,10 +5735,7 @@ generate_local_decl (gfc_symbol * sym) "imported at %L", sym->name, &sym->declared_at); } - if (sym->ns - && sym->ns->parent - && sym->ns->parent->code - && sym->ns->parent->code->op == EXEC_BLOCK) + if (sym->ns && sym->ns->construct_entities) { if (sym->attr.referenced) gfc_get_symbol_decl (sym); --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr89084.f90.jj 2019-02-01 18:29:56.776826089 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr89084.f90 2019-02-01 18:32:11.305594831 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +! PR fortran/89084 +! { dg-do run } + +integer function foo () + write (*,*) 'foo' + block + integer, parameter :: idxs(3) = (/ 1, 2, 3 /) + integer :: i + foo = 0 + do i = 1, size(idxs) + foo = foo + idxs(i) + enddo + end block +end function foo +program pr89084 + integer :: i + interface + integer function foo () + end function + end interface + i = foo () + if (i.ne.6) stop 1 +end --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/lto/pr89084_0.f90.jj 2019-02-01 18:33:12.500579868 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/lto/pr89084_0.f90 2019-02-01 18:33:31.387266622 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +! PR fortran/89084 +! { dg-lto-do link } +! { dg-lto-options {{ -O0 -flto }} } + +integer function foo () + write (*,*) 'foo' + block + integer, parameter :: idxs(3) = (/ 1, 2, 3 /) + integer :: i + foo = 0 + do i = 1, size(idxs) + foo = foo + idxs(i) + enddo + end block +end function foo +program pr89084 + integer :: i + interface + integer function foo () + end function + end interface + i = foo () + if (i.ne.6) stop 1 +end --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr83246.f90.jj 2019-02-01 20:19:04.567300205 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr83246.f90 2019-02-01 20:18:02.446316150 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +! PR fortran/83246 +! { dg-do link } + program dusty_corner + write(*,*)'BLOCK TESTS' + MAKEDATAP: block + integer,parameter :: scratch(*)=[1,2,3] + write(*,*)scratch + endblock MAKEDATAP + end program dusty_corner Jakub