My recent patch for 88815 and 78244 caused 89083, a P1 9 regression, which
happens to be the same problem as 80864 and its many dupes, something I'd
been meaning to fix for a long time.

Basically, the problem is repeated reshaping of a constructor, once when
parsing, and then again when substituting.  With the recent fix, we call
reshape_init + digest_init in finish_compound_literal even in a template
if the expression is not instantiation-dependent, and then again when
tsubst_*.

For instance, in initlist107.C, when parsing a functional cast, we call
finish_compound_literal which calls reshape_init, which turns

  { NON_LVALUE_EXPR<1>, NON_LVALUE_EXPR<2> }

into

  { { NON_LVALUE_EXPR<1>, NON_LVALUE_EXPR<2> } }

and then digest_init turns that into

  { .x = { 1, 2 } }

which is a compound literal (TREE_HAS_CONSTRUCTOR set), but the subexpression
"{ 1, 2 }" isn't.  "{ 1, 2 }" will now have the type int[3], so it's not
BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P.

And then tsubst_* processes "{ .x = { 1, 2 } }".  The case CONSTRUCTOR
in tsubst_copy_and_build will call finish_compound_literal on a copy of
"{ 1, 2 }" wrapped in a new { }, because the whole expr has 
TREE_HAS_CONSTRUCTOR.
That crashes in reshape_init_r in the
 6155       if (TREE_CODE (stripped_init) == CONSTRUCTOR)
block; we have a constructor, it's not COMPOUND_LITERAL_P, and because
digest_init had given it the type int[3], we hit
 6172               gcc_assert (BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (stripped_init));

As expand_default_init explains in a comment, a CONSTRUCTOR of the target's type
is a previously digested initializer, so we should probably do a similar trick
here.  This fixes all the variants of the problem I've come up with.

80864 is a similar case, we reshape when parsing and then second time in
fold_non_dependent_expr called from store_init_value, because of the 
'constexpr'.

Also update a stale comment.

Bootstrapped/regtest running on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk and 8 after a while?

2019-01-29  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/89083, c++/80864 - ICE with list initialization in template.
        * decl.c (reshape_init_r): Don't reshape a digested initializer.

        * g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist107.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist108.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist109.C: New test.

diff --git gcc/cp/decl.c gcc/cp/decl.c
index 79eeac177b6..da08ecc21aa 100644
--- gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -6161,11 +6161,17 @@ reshape_init_r (tree type, reshape_iter *d, bool 
first_initializer_p,
            ;
          else if (COMPOUND_LITERAL_P (stripped_init))
          /* For a nested compound literal, there is no need to reshape since
-            brace elision is not allowed. Even if we decided to allow it,
-            we should add a call to reshape_init in finish_compound_literal,
-            before calling digest_init, so changing this code would still
-            not be necessary.  */
+            we called reshape_init in finish_compound_literal, before calling
+            digest_init.  */
            gcc_assert (!BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (stripped_init));
+         /* Similarly, a CONSTRUCTOR of the target's type is a previously
+            digested initializer.  */
+         else if (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (type,
+                                                             TREE_TYPE (init)))
+           {
+             ++d->cur;
+             return init;
+           }
          else
            {
              ++d->cur;
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist107.C 
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist107.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9acfe7cb267
--- /dev/null
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist107.C
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// PR c++/89083
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-Wmissing-braces" }
+
+struct A { int x[3]; };
+
+template<class T>
+decltype(A{1, 2}, T()) fn1(T t) // { dg-warning "missing braces" }
+{
+  return t;
+}
+
+template<class T>
+decltype(A{{1, 2}}, T()) fn2(T t)
+{
+  return t;
+}
+
+void
+f()
+{
+  fn1(1);
+  fn2(1);
+}
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist108.C 
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist108.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e2839787fa5
--- /dev/null
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist108.C
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// PR c++/80864
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-Wmissing-braces" }
+
+struct S {
+  char c[1];
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+void
+fn ()
+{
+   constexpr S s1 = S{};
+   constexpr S s2 = S{{}};
+   constexpr S s3 = S{{{}}};
+   constexpr S s4 = {};
+   constexpr S s5 = {{}};
+   constexpr S s6 = {{{}}};
+   constexpr S s7{{}};
+   constexpr S s8{S{}};
+   constexpr S s9{S{{}}};
+   constexpr S s10{S{{{}}}};
+   constexpr S s11 = S();
+   constexpr S s12 = S({});
+   constexpr S s13 = S({{}});
+   constexpr S s14 = {{}};
+   constexpr S s15 = {{{}}};
+}
+
+void
+foo ()
+{
+  fn<int>();
+}
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist109.C 
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist109.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1351a2d57ce
--- /dev/null
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist109.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// PR c++/80864
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-Wmissing-braces" }
+
+struct S {};
+struct A { S s[1]; };
+
+template <typename>
+struct R { static constexpr auto h = A{S{}}; }; // { dg-warning "missing 
braces" }
+
+template <typename>
+struct R2 { static constexpr auto h = A{{S{}}}; };
+
+A foo = R<int>::h;
+A foo2 = R2<int>::h;

Reply via email to