Since C++20 P0634R3 we sometimes treat certain qualified-ids as types, so that
the user doesn't have to type 'typename'.  But this was broken for this case:

  template<typename T> T::type N::v(T::value);

which, if T::value is a type, is a function template declaration.  But if
T::value is a value, it's a variable template definition.  So we can't
always assume T::value is a type.

This patch fixes it according to the proposed resolution discussed on the core
reflector (2018-10-29) -- perform name lookup to see if N::v is one or more
function templates, and if it isn't, don't consider 'typename' optional in the
parameter list.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?

2019-01-23  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/88757 - qualified name treated wrongly as type.
        * parser.c (cp_parser_direct_declarator): Don't treat qualified-ids
        in parameter-list as types if name lookup for declarator-id didn't
        find one or more function templates.

        * g++.dg/cpp0x/dependent2.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/cpp2a/typename10.C: Remove dg-error.
        * g++.dg/cpp2a/typename12.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/template/static30.C: Remove dg-error.

diff --git gcc/cp/parser.c gcc/cp/parser.c
index 7d7b0292650..dc9d651308a 100644
--- gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -21098,6 +21098,33 @@ cp_parser_direct_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
 
            if (pack_expansion_p)
              maybe_warn_variadic_templates ();
+
+           /* We're looking for this case in [temp.res]:
+              A qualified-id is assumed to name a type if [...]
+              - it is a decl-specifier of the decl-specifier-seq of a
+                parameter-declaration in a declarator of a function or
+                function template declaration, ... */
+           if (cxx_dialect >= cxx2a
+               && (flags & CP_PARSER_FLAGS_TYPENAME_OPTIONAL)
+               && declarator->kind == cdk_id
+               /* ...whose declarator-id is qualified.  */
+               && qualifying_scope != NULL_TREE
+               && !at_class_scope_p ()
+               && cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_OPEN_PAREN))
+             {
+               /* Now we have something like
+                  template <typename T> int C::x(S::p);
+                  which can be a function template declaration or a
+                  variable template definition.  If name lookup for
+                  the declarator-id C::x finds one or more function
+                  templates, assume S::p to name a type.  Otherwise,
+                  don't.  */
+               tree decl
+                 = cp_parser_lookup_name_simple (parser, unqualified_name,
+                                                 token->location);
+               if (!is_overloaded_fn (decl))
+                 flags &= ~CP_PARSER_FLAGS_TYPENAME_OPTIONAL;
+             }
          }
 
        handle_declarator:;
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/dependent2.C 
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/dependent2.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a0740d404a3
--- /dev/null
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/dependent2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/88757
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <class T> struct C {
+    static int x;
+};
+template <class U> struct S {
+    static const int size = 1;
+};
+template <class T> int C<T>::x(S<T>::size);
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/typename10.C 
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/typename10.C
index fa2cd000b5d..1413268ba16 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/typename10.C
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/typename10.C
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ namespace N2 {
   template<typename T> extern T::type v; // #1a
   //template<typename T> T::type v(typename T::value); // #1b
 }
-template<typename T> T::type N2::v(T::value); // { dg-error "" }
+template<typename T> T::type N2::v(T::value);
 
 namespace A {
   inline namespace B { template<typename T> int f(typename T::foo); }
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/typename12.C 
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/typename12.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..97962e53d65
--- /dev/null
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/typename12.C
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// P0634R3
+// { dg-do compile { target c++2a } }
+
+struct W {
+  template<typename T>
+  static int fn1 (T::X);
+  template<typename T>
+  static int fn2 (T::X);
+  template<typename T>
+  static int fn2 (T::X, int);
+};
+
+template<typename T>
+int W::fn1 (T::X p) { return p; }
+
+template<typename T>
+int W::fn2 (T::X p) { return p; }
+
+template<typename T>
+int fn2 (typename T::X p) { return p; }
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/static30.C 
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/static30.C
index 8b8637a1abe..07dafe23ffa 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/static30.C
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/static30.C
@@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ template <int> struct A
   static const int i2;
 };
 
-template <int N> const int A<N>::i1(A<N>::i); // { dg-error "no declaration 
matches" "" { target c++2a } }
+template <int N> const int A<N>::i1(A<N>::i);
 template <int N> const int A<N>::i2(3, A<N>::i); // { dg-error "expression 
list" }

Reply via email to