Am 22.01.2019 um 14:21 schrieb Dominique d'Humières: > > >> Le 22 janv. 2019 à 10:02, Manfred Schwarb <manfre...@gmx.ch> a écrit : >> >> Dominique, thanks a lot. >> >> I got the request to share my script, so I attached it to this mail. >> Be aware that the script reports numerous false positives. >> As one can expect, also gcc.dg would appreciate some love… > > I had a quick look at the script and noticed that the paths are hard-coded. > Assuming the script is going to contrib/, would it be possible to replace > them with > relative ones? Some comments to explain how to use it would also be nice. > > Note that I have no idea if this script requires a copyright assignment. >
I do not have an assignment, and frankly, I do not intend to get one. But I could donate this code to someone, if this helps. My expectation was that one has to edit the script anyway to adapt it to different test-suites or to fiddle with filtering. I guess this script is very far from perfect. >> >> While cleaning up the script, I found some refinements, and another >> 7 glitches, see attachment. >> >> could you take care of these as well? > > Done at r268148 after removing a missed double spaces in > gfortran.dg/spread_simplify_1.f90 > and renaming gfortran.dg.orig/newunit_5.f90.f90 to > gfortran.dg.orig/newunit_5.f90. > I guess "dg-do run" was on purpose, this is an ugly hack to execute the test only once and not iterate over the full set of options. This is often done on heavy-weight tests to save execution time. > Thanks, > > Dominique > >> >> Cheers, Manfred >> >> >> Am 21.01.2019 um 22:47 schrieb Dominique d'Humières: >>> Hi Manfred, >>> >>>> could someone please check and commit? >>> >>> Tested and committed as obvious at r268125. >>> >>> Thanks for the patch. >>> >>> Dominique >>> >>> >> >> <testsuite-test.sh><directives2.patch> > >
