On 10/26/2011 04:35 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
We have that parser->scope is a RECORD_TYPE and postfix_expression is an INDIRECT_REF.
Ah, OK. I guess we swallow up the namespace while parsing the full nested-name-specifier and it isn't a problem. So I think handling this here should be OK. But why check for ARROW_EXPR? Can't you construct a similar testcase using .?
I'll deal with 50870. Jason
