I've committed the attached patch as obvious.
2019-01-09 Steven G. Kargl <ka...@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/88376
* resolve.c (is_illegal_recursion): Remove an assert().
2019-01-09 Steven G. Kargl <ka...@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/88376
* gfortran.dg/pr88376.f90: New test.
--
Steve
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 267779)
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c (working copy)
@@ -1686,8 +1686,6 @@ is_illegal_recursion (gfc_symbol* sym, gfc_namespace*
|| gfc_fl_struct (sym->attr.flavor))
return false;
- gcc_assert (sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE);
-
/* If we've got an ENTRY, find real procedure. */
if (sym->attr.entry && sym->ns->entries)
proc_sym = sym->ns->entries->sym;
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr88376.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr88376.f90 (nonexistent)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr88376.f90 (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+module m
+ integer :: n
+contains
+ subroutine s
+ character(n(3)) :: c ! { dg-error "not a function" }
+ end
+end
