On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 11:24:07AM +0000, Sudakshina Das wrote:
> > PR fortran/45513
> > PR fortran/81509
> > * gfortran.dg/graphite/id-26.f03: Fix non-conforming use of IAND.
> > * gfortran.dg/pr81509_1.f90: New test.
> > * gfortran.dg/pr81509_2.f90: New test.
> >
> This patch has caused the following failures on aarch64-none-linux-gnu:
>
> FAIL: libgomp.fortran/aligned1.f03 -O0 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: libgomp.fortran/aligned1.f03 -O1 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: libgomp.fortran/aligned1.f03 -O2 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: libgomp.fortran/aligned1.f03 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for
> excess errors)
> FAIL: libgomp.fortran/aligned1.f03 -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: libgomp.fortran/aligned1.f03 -Os (test for excess errors)
>
> With the failure as:
>
> Excess errors:
> /build/src/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/aligned1.f03:55:14:
> Error: Arguments of 'iand' have different kind type parameters at (1)
> /build/src/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/aligned1.f03:59:14:
> Error: Arguments of 'iand' have different kind type parameters at (1)
>
Well, it nice to see that the patch is catching invalid Fortran.
Can you test this patch?
Index: libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/aligned1.f03
===================================================================
--- libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/aligned1.f03 (revision 267418)
+++ libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/aligned1.f03 (working copy)
@@ -52,11 +52,11 @@
! Attempt to create 64-byte aligned allocatable
do i = 1, 64
allocate (c(1023 + i))
- if (iand (loc (c(1)), 63) == 0) exit
+ if (iand (int(loc (c(1)), 8), int(63, 8)) == 0) exit
deallocate (c)
allocate (b(i)%a(1023 + i))
allocate (c(1023 + i))
- if (iand (loc (c(1)), 63) == 0) exit
+ if (iand (int(loc (c(1)), 8), int(63, 8)) == 0) exit
deallocate (c)
end do
if (allocated (c)) then
--
Steve
20170425 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWUpyCsUKR4
20161221 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbCHE-hONow
