On Dez 17 2018, "Uecker, Martin" <martin.uec...@med.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
> Am Montag, den 17.12.2018, 10:28 -0700 schrieb Jeff Law: >> On 12/16/18 3:45 PM, Uecker, Martin wrote: >> > But most architectures require a higher alignment anyway. >> > Here is a list of all targets where function alignment >> > is 1 byte: >> > >> > gcc/config/avr/avr.h:#define FUNCTION_BOUNDARY 8 >> > gcc/config/i386/i386.h:#define FUNCTION_BOUNDARY 8 >> > gcc/config/m32c/m32c.h:#define FUNCTION_BOUNDARY 8 >> > gcc/config/mn10300/mn10300.h:#define FUNCTION_BOUNDARY 8 >> > gcc/config/pa/pa.h:#define FUNCTION_BOUNDARY BITS_PER_WORD >> > gcc/config/rl78/rl78.h:#define FUNCTION_BOUNDARY 8 >> > gcc/config/rx/rx.h:#define FUNCTION_BOUNDARY ((rx_cpu_type >> > == RX100 || >> > rx_cpu_type == RX200) ? 4 : 8) > > (BTW: pa was included here by mistake) The rx config apparently confused bits and bytes. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."
