On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> Richi, if it's the use of the bit in the tree node that you're worried >>> about, >>> we could probably put it in cgraph_node.local instead. But we do need >>> the >>> knowledge. >> >> Yeah, I was worried about /* 1 bit left */ ;) Putting it in the >> cgraph node sounds more appealing >> indeed. > > > Richi, is this a blocker, or merely a suggestion? If this is a requirement > for merging, I can do so. Just want to make sure where best to spend my > time.
Well - we usually don't grab bits off the tree nodes lightly. Especially if the cgraph seems to be more fit. > If this is a suggestion, I can put it on my laundry list of future things > todo (after merge, 4.8?, etc). There are not many consumers of the flag, so fixing it shouldn't be hard. For 4.7 definitely. Thanks, Richard.
