On 11/8/18 1:34 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:44:44PM +0000, Sam Tebbs wrote: >> Does your patch fix the incorrect generation of "scvtf s1, s1"? I was >> looking at the issue as well and don't want to do any overlapping work. > > I don't know. Well, there are no incorrect code issues I know of at all > now; but you mean that it is taking an instruction more than you would > like to see, I suppose? Which is ultimately similar to the 3 regressions HJ has reported on x86_64.
jeff
