On 10/30/18 12:18 PM, Stafford Horne wrote: > OK, I was just being lazy allowing the spill. Do you think the split/expand > would be an RTL using left shift / right shift? Can you think of something > more clever? Since "real" hardware does not usually support shifts with an > immediate we will need 1 instruction to load shift amount. i.e. > > l.ori %0, r0, 24 > l.sll %1, %1, %0 > l.sra %0, %1, %0
This clobbers %1. So, ouch. I think we will want to avoid creating this particular pattern in the first place unless l.exts exists then. We would use another pattern like (define_insn "*sign_extend_mem<mode>" [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r") (sign_extend:SI (match_operand:HI 1 "memory_operand" "m")))] "" "l.lhs\t%0, %1") following the TARGET_SEXT pattern. In this way combine can use this pattern without getting us into trouble with the register allocator later. > I am submitting patches on my git branch or1k-port-4. Just in case you want to > track progress. Will do. r~