On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 02:45:20PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Here is an updated doc proposal (that would go in patch #1, without
> changing this one):
> @item -mfdpic
> @opindex mfdpic
> Select the FDPIC ABI, which uses function descriptors to represent
> pointers to functions. When the compiler is configured for
> @code{arm-*-uclinuxfdpiceabi} targets, this option is on by default
> and implies @option{-fPIE} if none of the PIC/PIE-related options is
> provided. On other targets, it only enables the FDPIC-specific code
> generation features, and the user should explicitly provide the
> PIC/PIE-related options as needed.
Most other things seem to put -mno-fdpic in an @itemx and mno-fdpic in
an @opindex as well, in similar cases.
> The opposite @option{-mno-fdpic} option is useful (and required) to
> build the Linux kernel using the same toolchain as the one used to
> build the userland programs.
>
> Is it clearer? Does it read OK?
It reads fine I think.
Segher
