On 10/29/18 9:40 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 10/27/18 6:15 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2018-10-26 10:25 a.m., Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>>> From aea94273e7a477a03d1ee10a5d9043d6d13b8e8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>> From: Michael Ploujnikov <michael.ploujni...@oracle.com>
>>>> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:16:36 -0400
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] Avoid unnecessarily numbering cloned symbols.
>>>>
>>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>>
>>>> 2018-10-26  Michael Ploujnikov  <michael.ploujni...@oracle.com>
>>>>
>>>>    * cgraph.h (clone_function_name_1): Replaced by new
>>>>      clone_function_name_numbered that takes name as string; for
>>>>      privatize_symbol_name_1 use only.
>>>>      (clone_function_name): Renamed to
>>>>      clone_function_name_numbered to be explicit about numbering.
>>>>      (clone_function_name): New two-argument function that does
>>>>      not number its output.
>>>>      (clone_function_name): New three-argument function that
>>>>      takes a number to append to its output.
>>>>    * cgraphclones.c (duplicate_thunk_for_node):
>>>>      (clone_function_name_1): Renamed.
>>>>      (clone_function_name_numbered): Two new functions.
>>>>      (clone_function_name): Improved documentation.
>>>>      (cgraph_node::create_virtual_clone): Use clone_function_name_numbered.
>>>>    * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (make_resolver_func): Ditto.
>>>>    * final.c (final_scan_insn_1): Use the new clone_function_name
>>>>      without numbering.
>>>>    * multiple_target.c (create_dispatcher_calls): Ditto.
>>>>      (create_target_clone): Ditto.
>>>>    * omp-expand.c (grid_expand_target_grid_body): Ditto.
>>>>    * omp-low.c (create_omp_child_function_name): Ditto.
>>>>    * omp-simd-clone.c (simd_clone_create): Ditto.
>>>>    * symtab.c (simd_symtab_node::noninterposable_alias): Use the
>>>>      new clone_function_name without numbering.
>>>>
>>>> gcc/lto/ChangeLog:
>>>>
>>>> 2018-10-26  Michael Ploujnikov  <michael.ploujni...@oracle.com>
>>>>
>>>>    * lto-partition.c (privatize_symbol_name_1): Use
>>>>      clone_function_name_numbered.
>>>>
>>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>>
>>>> 2018-10-26  Michael Ploujnikov  <michael.ploujni...@oracle.com>
>>>>
>>>>    * gcc.dg/tree-prof/cold_partition_label.c: Update for cold
>>>>      section names without numbers.
>>>>    * gcc.dg/tree-prof/section-attr-1.c: Ditto.
>>>>    * gcc.dg/tree-prof/section-attr-2.c: Ditto.
>>>>    * gcc.dg/tree-prof/section-attr-3.c: Ditto.
>>>
>>> OK,
>>> thanks!
>>> Honza
>>>
>>
>> Thanks again for the review. This is my first patch and I don't have
>> commit access. What should I do?
> 
> I'm going to install the patch on your behalf. For write access you should
> follow these intructions: 
> https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/svnwrite.html#policies
> 
> Martin
> 
>>
>>
>> - Michael
>>
> 

But first I see some failures when I tried to apply the patch:

$ patch -p0 --dry-run < 
~/Downloads/0001-Avoid-unnecessarily-numbering-cloned-symbols.patch
checking file gcc/cgraph.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 2382 with fuzz 1 (offset 14 lines).
checking file gcc/cgraphclones.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 317 (offset 1 line).
checking file gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 36997 (offset 485 lines).
checking file gcc/lto/lto-partition.c
checking file gcc/multiple_target.c
checking file gcc/omp-expand.c
checking file gcc/omp-low.c
checking file gcc/omp-simd-clone.c
checking file gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/cold_partition_label.c
checking file gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/section-attr-1.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 42.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED
checking file gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/section-attr-2.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 41.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED
checking file gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/section-attr-3.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 42.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED

Can you please rebase that on top of current trunk?
Thanks,
Martin

Reply via email to