On 10/15/18 12:45 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
        && ((TREE_CODE (declspecs->type) != TYPENAME_TYPE
+          && TREE_CODE (declspecs->type) != DECLTYPE_TYPE
           && MAYBE_CLASS_TYPE_P (declspecs->type))

I would think that the MAYBE_CLASS_TYPE_P here should be CLASS_TYPE_P, and then we can remove the TYPENAME_TYPE check. Or do we want to allow template type parameters for some reason?

Jason

Reply via email to