> On 18 Oct 2018, at 14:14, Sam Tebbs <sam.te...@arm.com> wrote: > > > > On 10/12/2018 07:43 PM, Olivier Hainque wrote: >>> On 12 Oct 2018, at 05:50, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> CC'ing the aarch64 maintainers as they'll have to approve it. >>> I'm guessing you've tested this in the usual way (bootstrap and test)? >> Sorry, I failed to mention the testing indeed. We don't >> have a native box at hand, so I'm not really able to >> conduct regular bootstrap and dg testing per se. > > Hi Olivier, > > I managed to run a bootstrap build with your patch applied on one of our > aarch64 machines, so there shouldn't be any problems in that regard.
Great ! Thanks a lot Sam ! Much appreciated. I'm currently building our vxworks port on a gcc-8 source base and will then most probably retain the static approach instead of going runtime. The only difference there would be wrt to this part is the use of the macro within called_used_regs[] as well, part of what we discussed with Kyrill. I'll reapply my testing, and with the one you just made on top, I think the syntax / logic of the change is straightforward enough to have confidence. With Kind Regards, Olivier
