On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 01:53:09PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 01:36:36PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Oh, and I personally find %` ugly ;) What non-alnum chars
> > > > are taken by backends?
> > >
> > > I think only double quote, backslash, backtick remain unclaimed. And of
> > > course
> > > ASCII \0 through \040 and \177 ;)
> >
> > As has been said, the way microblaze claims non-alnum characters it doesn't
> > support is just bogus, so we shouldn't consider them to be taken.
>
> I understand - I've made an effort to manually go through the backends and
> find characters they meaningfully handle in their print_operand hooks. In
> particular MIPS handles all of []()<> (but %[ is special anyway, for
> %[name] substitution).
Ugh. Wonder how %[name] then works on mips or if its %[ something %] works.
Jakub
