On 11 October 2018 23:36:15 CEST, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
>But I'm assuming that systems with no usleep are probably rare, and >can live with rounding up to sleep for a full second. Well conforming implementations usually won't have usleep which was obscolencent in SUSv3 and removed from SUSv4. As you certainly know we have clock_nanosleep / nanosleep nowadays. thanks,
