[PATCH, rs6000] Fix expected error output for test case.
r264355 removed some spelling suggestions including for "bool" as used
in this test case.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu and
powerpc64be-unknown-linux-gnu with no regressions. Is this ok for trunk?
2018-10-03 Bill Seurer <seu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
PR target/87486
* gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c: Fix expected error output.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c (revision 264812)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c (working copy)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
#include <xmmintrin.h>
-bool foo (int x) /* { dg-error "unknown type name 'bool'; did you mean
'_Bool'?" } */
+bool foo (int x) /* { dg-error "unknown type name 'bool'" } */
{
return x == 2;
}
--
-Bill Seurer
