On 9/27/18 11:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:14 PM Indu Bhagat <indu.bha...@oracle.com> wrote: >> >> Done. Attached is updated patch. >> >> Patch is tested on x86_64 > > You obviously did _not_ properly test the patch since it causes a > bunch of new testsuite > failures: > > FAIL: g++.dg/pr60518.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/pr60518.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/pr60518.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/dom-invalid.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/dom-invalid.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/dom-invalid.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/guality/pr55665.C -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin > -flto-partition=none line 23 p == 40 > FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr59265.C -O0 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr59265.C -O1 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr59265.C -O2 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr59265.C -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin > -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr59265.C -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin > -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr59265.C -O3 -g (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr59265.C -Os (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/tree-prof/morefunc.C compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/tree-prof/morefunc.C execution, -fprofile-use > -D_PROFILE_USE > > and more. Please get up to speed with GCC development and testing > requirements! > > Richard.
I'll cook patch for it in order to remove the failures as soon as possible. Martin > >> Thanks >> >> >> On 09/24/2018 09:37 AM, Martin Sebor wrote: >>> I would suggest to use the term "remove" or "delete" instead of >>> the informal "wipe out" when referring to removing files or their >>> contents. >>> >>> Martin >>
