> Ah. All validity issues aside, then "Dereferencing unaligned > pointers yields a compile-time error" or "pointers with unknown > alignment" would be much less cryptic: the "Dereferencing -1" > just sounds like *(char *) -1 or a cut
Good point.
> Ah. All validity issues aside, then "Dereferencing unaligned > pointers yields a compile-time error" or "pointers with unknown > alignment" would be much less cryptic: the "Dereferencing -1" > just sounds like *(char *) -1 or a cut
Good point.