On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:55 PM Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I thought I was done with this one as well, but it looks like we can
> push more things out to wide-int-range.*.
>
> I also pushed the optimization itself into wide_int_range_bit_{and,or},
> for maximal sharing.
>
> And finally, I split out getting the mask and the bounds into its own
> function (wide_int_range_get_mask_and_bounds), because I have an
> upcoming optimization that uses this information, and there's no sense
> duplicating work :).
>
> No change in functionality.
>
> Tested on x86-64 Linux with all languages.
>
> OK?OK and sorry for the delay. Richard. >
