Jason and Nathan, while I completed one C+ non-bug entry with the patch below, I am not sure the items as such is really still relevant?
In fact, if you could have a look at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#nonbugs_cxx and advise which entries perhaps should be removed (or updated or added), I'll take care. Thanks, Gerald Add a missing <dt> element to the C++ Non-bugs section. Index: bugs/index.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/bugs/index.html,v retrieving revision 1.126 diff -u -r1.126 index.html --- bugs/index.html 1 Sep 2018 23:42:01 -0000 1.126 +++ bugs/index.html 2 Sep 2018 13:30:52 -0000 @@ -538,6 +538,7 @@ <h2 id="nonbugs_cxx">C++</h2> <dl> +<dt><code>export</code></dt> <dd><p>Most C++ compilers (G++ included) do not yet implement <code>export</code>, which is necessary for separate compilation of template declarations and definitions. Without <code>export</code>, a
