On 08/31/2018 11:59 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 30/08/18 16:53, Sam Tebbs wrote:
On 08/28/2018 11:53 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> Hm, I'm not very sure about the naming here; "left consecutive"
isn't a
> common phrase to denote the mask you're looking for (exact_log2
(-i) != -1
> if I'm reading right), and is misleading 0x0000ffff is 'left
consecutive'
> too, just with zeroes rather than ones.
>
I think you're right about it not being the best naming. Do you have any
suggestions for a better name?
Naming things is hard... :(
How about aarch64_hi_bits_all_ones_p ?
Kyrill
That sounds good! Although I'm confused about what the 'p' means.
