On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 12:46, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com> wrote: > > Hi Christophe, > > On 13/07/18 17:10, christophe.l...@st.com wrote: > > From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> > > > > 2018-XX-XX Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@st.com> > > Mickaël Guêné <mickael.gu...@st.com> > > > > gcc/ > > * config/arm/arm.opt: Add -mfdpic option. > > > > Change-Id: Ie5c4ed7434488933de6133186da09cd3ea1291a7 > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.opt b/gcc/config/arm/arm.opt > > index a1286a4..231c1cb 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.opt > > +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.opt > > @@ -302,3 +302,7 @@ When linking for big-endian targets, generate a legacy > > BE32 format image. > > mbranch-cost= > > Target RejectNegative Joined UInteger Var(arm_branch_cost) Init(-1) > > Cost to assume for a branch insn. > > + > > +mfdpic > > +Target Report Mask(FDPIC) > > +Enable Function Descriptor PIC mode. > > So since this is an ABI, why isn't it just adding a new -mabi value?
I think it's just an oversight, because we always talk about "FDPIC mode". I can change it, it's meant to be mostly hidden and toggled by the target name. > In any case, command-line option changes need documentation in invoke.texi. I keep forgetting this, sorry. > Thanks, > Kyrill > > > > -- > > 2.6.3 > > >
