On 08/14/2018 10:49 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> I guess this was a cut&pasto. I caught it during code review. It
> doesn't seem to matter much: I haven't been able to get any codegen
> difference from this change, not in a bootstrap, not in test runs. I
> even put a gcc_unreachable() in case the test on rhs2 were to return
> false (which would never happen after the test on rhs1 passed, when rhs1
> and rhs2 were the same), and still no hits in stage3. Anyway...
>
> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu. Ok to install?
>
> From: Alexandre Oliva <aol...@redhat.com>
>
> for gcc/ChangeLog
>
> * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (is_reassociable_op): Fix cut&pasto.
OK.
jeff
