On 05/29/2018 11:25 AM, Mike Gulick wrote: > On 03/04/2018 02:27 PM, Mike Gulick wrote: >> >> >> On 02/09/2018 05:54 PM, Mike Gulick wrote: >>> Hi David, >>> >>> Here is a new version of the linemap patch (see my earlier emails for an >>> updated >>> version of the test code). >> >> <snip> >> >> Hi David, >> >> Just wondering if you have had a chance to look at these updated patches >> yet. Let me know if you have any questions I can answer, or if there is >> anything you would like me to do that would make reviewing them easier >> (reposting, rebasing, refactoring the bug fix from the diagnostics >> change in the last patch). >> >> The most recent postings are: >> Bug fix patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00557.html >> Test case: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01993.html >> >> Thanks, >> Mike >> > > Hi David, > > Now that gcc 8.1 is out the door, would you have any time to review these > patches? I re-tested them after rebasing on the latest git master, and > everything still behaved as expected. I can post the rebased patches if you > would like, but it was a trivial merge with no conflicts. > > Thanks, > Mike >
I'd still like to get this bug fixed. I don't think I need the [RFC] tag any more on these patches. Should I post a new thread to this list to get the ball rolling again?
