On Jul 28 2018, "slyfox.inbox.ru via gcc-patches" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> diff --git a/libitm/config/sh/sjlj.S b/libitm/config/sh/sjlj.S > index 043f36749be..80a810d8360 100644 > --- a/libitm/config/sh/sjlj.S > +++ b/libitm/config/sh/sjlj.S > @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ _ITM_beginTransaction: > #else > cfi_def_cfa_offset (4*10) > #endif > -#if defined HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_VISIBILITY || !defined __PIC__ > +#if defined HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_VISIBILITY && !defined __PIC__ > mov.l .Lbegin, r1 > jsr @r1 > mov r15, r5 > @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ _ITM_beginTransaction: > > .align 2 > .Lbegin: > -#if defined HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_VISIBILITY || !defined __PIC__ > +#if defined HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_VISIBILITY && !defined __PIC__ > .long GTM_begin_transaction > #else > .long GTM_begin_transaction@PCREL-(.Lbegin0-.) If those references to hidden symbols cannot be resolved by the linker then the use of HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_VISIBILITY is pointless. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."
