On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 18:35, Mikael Morin <mikael.mo...@sfr.fr> wrote: > On Saturday 29 October 2011 14:43:22 Mikael Morin wrote: >> > FWIW, it seems ifort 12.0 uses "UNDEFINED" in this case; I suppose a >> > case could be made for using the same. Comments? >> >> Let's go for UNDEFINED then. > On second thought, UNSPECIFIED is better as UNDEFINED is for another case.
Hmm, indeed, on second thought I agree as well. Further comparisons: pathf95 3.2.99: UNKNOWN pgf95 11.2-0: REWIND (which is clearly wrong, also inquire_5.f90 failed earlier because trying to get the position of a direct access file returned ASIS while the standard requires UNDEFINED in this case). -- Janne Blomqvist
