On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 08:40:01AM -0500, Kelvin Nilsen wrote: > To improve internal consistency and to improve consistency with published ABI > documents, this patch replaces the __uint128_t type with __uint128 and > replaces __int128_t with __int128.
> Is this ok for trunk? Looks good, thanks! Most (all?) of these functions are not documented in the ABI, but this is a step forward anyway. Okay for trunk. What do things like error messages involving these functions look like? What types do those say? Segher
