On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> I've noticed that while Jason documented the -fabi-version=13/-Wabi=12
> 8.2 fix in the C++ section, there is no mention of it in the 8.2 section,
> so if people just quickly look at what significant has changed in 8.2,
> they will not notice that.
> 
> This patch fixes the markup in Jason's changes <code> etc. and adds a short
> note also to the 8.2 section, with a cross reference to the C++ section.
> 
> Ok for wwwdocs?

LGTM.

Thanks,
Richard.

> --- htdocs/gcc-8/changes.html 22 Jul 2018 08:26:21 -0000      1.91
> +++ htdocs/gcc-8/changes.html 26 Jul 2018 09:18:19 -0000
> @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ $ gcc unclosed-2.c
>  
>  <h3 id="cxx">C++</h3>
>  <ul>
> -  <li>GCC 8 (-fabi-version=12) has a couple of corrections to the calling
> +  <li>GCC 8 (<code>-fabi-version=12</code>) has a couple of corrections to 
> the calling
>      convention, which changes the ABI for some uncommon code:<ul>
>        <li>Passing an empty class as an argument now takes up no space on
>       x86_64, as required by the psABI.</li>
> @@ -547,12 +547,13 @@ $ gcc unclosed-2.c
>       impossible.</li>
>        <li><b>WARNING:</b> In GCC 8.1 the second change mistakenly also 
> affects
>       classes with a deleted copy constructor and defaulted trivial move
> -     constructor (bug c++/86094).  This issue is fixed in GCC 8.2
> -     (-fabi-version=13).</li>
> +     constructor (bug <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/PR86094";>c++/86094</a>).
> +     This issue is fixed in GCC 8.2 (<code>-fabi-version=13</code>).</li>
>      </ul>
> -    You can test whether these changes affect your code with -Wabi=11 (or
> -    -Wabi=12 in GCC 8.2 for the third issue); if these changes are 
> problematic
> -    for your project, the GCC 7 ABI can be selected with -fabi-version=11.
> +    You can test whether these changes affect your code with
> +    <code>-Wabi=11</code> (or <code>-Wabi=12</code> in GCC 8.2 for the third 
> issue);
> +    if these changes are problematic for your project, the GCC 7 ABI can be 
> selected
> +    with <code>-fabi-version=11</code>.
>    </li>
>    <li>The value of the C++11 <code>alignof</code> operator has been corrected
>      to match C <code>_Alignof</code> (minimum alignment) rather than
> @@ -1327,6 +1328,17 @@ are not listed here).</p>
>       in the partitioning algorithm while building large binaries.</li>
>    </ul>
>  
> +<h3>Language Specific Changes</h3>
> +
> +<h4>C++</h4>
> +  GCC 8.2 fixed a bug introduced in GCC 8.1 affecting passing or returning
> +  of classes with a deleted copy constructor and defaulted trivial move
> +  constructor (bug <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/PR86094";>c++/86094</a>).
> +  GCC 8.2 introduces <code>-fabi-version=13</code> and makes it the default,
> +  ABI incompatibilities between GCC 8.1 and 8.2 can be reported with
> +  <code>-Wabi=12</code>.  See <a href="#cxx">C++ changes</a> for more
> +  details.
> +
>  <h3>Target Specific Changes</h3>
>  
>  <h4>IA-32/x86-64</h4>
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 
21284 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to